TY - CONF
T1 - A Centralized Office for Clinical Students Placements across Professions is a Win-Win
AU - Rivera, Kristin
AU - Brill, John R
AU - Hartlaub, Jennifer
AU - Quinlan, Sharon K
AU - Klug, Jennifer
AU - Rivard, Heather
AU - Hopkins, Diana
AU - Peterson, Amy E.
AU - Anderson, Andy
AU - Simpson, Deborah
AU - Teacher & Educator Resources,
N1 - Rivera K, Brill J, Hartlaub J, Quinlan SK, Klug J, Rivard H, Hopkins D, Peterson AE, Anderson A, Simpson D. A Centralized Office for Clinical Students Placements across Professions is a Win-Win. AAMC-Central Group on Educational Affairs Annual Meeting. Innovation Medical Education. March 21-23, 2018. Rochester, MN.
PY - 2018/3/21
Y1 - 2018/3/21
N2 - A Centralized Office for Clinical Students Placements across Professions is a Win-Win
Kristin Rivera, John Brill, MD, MPH, Jennifer Hartlaub, DNP, APNP,
FNP-BC, Sharon K. Quinlan, M.S.N., M.B.A., R.N. Jennifer Klug, MSN,
APRN, FNP, Heather Rivard, Dianna Hopkins, Amy E. Peterson, Andy
Anderson, MD, MBA, Deborah Simpson, PhD
Objective
To streamline student onboarding/orientation and optimize
opportunities for Interprofessional Education Collaborative Practice
[IPECP] by centralizing clinical student placements for multiple health
professions.
Background or theoretic framework/important
Students from multiple health professions require clinical training.
Medical student [MS] placements are typically coordinated through by
department/rotation coordinators assuring that there are sufficient site
resources to meet the education requirements and to coordinate
on-boarding and orientation (e.g., name badges, IT access, compliance
training). However, other professions’ students (e.g., nurse
practitioner [NP] and physician assistant [PA] may also secure
placements at the same site independently from MS process potentially
overwhelming site/preceptor resources with missed opportunities for
IPECP.
Instructional methods and materials / how
Leaders from medicine, NP and PA met and agreed to streamline
clinical student placements and processes. Leaders soon recognized the
cost/benefits that would emerge from centralizing all placements in one
office. Crosscutting onboarding and orientation elements were identified
(e.g., EPIC training, wayfinding, HIPAA) and workflows created with
associated software and staffing resource needs. Funding was
realigned/secured to create a centralized Clinical Student Services
(CSS) Office.
Educational Outcomes
STRENGTHS: 1,000 clinical student placements / year are now centrally
managed. Preceptors and students are highly satisfied, reporting time
saved and efficiencies. Students highly evaluate shared orientation and
onboarding activities creating a positive “first impression” of the
clinical placement. Centralization supports easy identification of
learners by clinical site providing, in advance of learner arrival,
opportunities for design of IPECP initiatives.
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT: Expansion of preceptor registry and electronic reporting data scoreboards.
FEASIBILITY: ROI reveals that the costs associated with professions
independently managing clinical student placements makes a strong
business case with single multi-profession placement office.
AB - A Centralized Office for Clinical Students Placements across Professions is a Win-Win
Kristin Rivera, John Brill, MD, MPH, Jennifer Hartlaub, DNP, APNP,
FNP-BC, Sharon K. Quinlan, M.S.N., M.B.A., R.N. Jennifer Klug, MSN,
APRN, FNP, Heather Rivard, Dianna Hopkins, Amy E. Peterson, Andy
Anderson, MD, MBA, Deborah Simpson, PhD
Objective
To streamline student onboarding/orientation and optimize
opportunities for Interprofessional Education Collaborative Practice
[IPECP] by centralizing clinical student placements for multiple health
professions.
Background or theoretic framework/important
Students from multiple health professions require clinical training.
Medical student [MS] placements are typically coordinated through by
department/rotation coordinators assuring that there are sufficient site
resources to meet the education requirements and to coordinate
on-boarding and orientation (e.g., name badges, IT access, compliance
training). However, other professions’ students (e.g., nurse
practitioner [NP] and physician assistant [PA] may also secure
placements at the same site independently from MS process potentially
overwhelming site/preceptor resources with missed opportunities for
IPECP.
Instructional methods and materials / how
Leaders from medicine, NP and PA met and agreed to streamline
clinical student placements and processes. Leaders soon recognized the
cost/benefits that would emerge from centralizing all placements in one
office. Crosscutting onboarding and orientation elements were identified
(e.g., EPIC training, wayfinding, HIPAA) and workflows created with
associated software and staffing resource needs. Funding was
realigned/secured to create a centralized Clinical Student Services
(CSS) Office.
Educational Outcomes
STRENGTHS: 1,000 clinical student placements / year are now centrally
managed. Preceptors and students are highly satisfied, reporting time
saved and efficiencies. Students highly evaluate shared orientation and
onboarding activities creating a positive “first impression” of the
clinical placement. Centralization supports easy identification of
learners by clinical site providing, in advance of learner arrival,
opportunities for design of IPECP initiatives.
AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT: Expansion of preceptor registry and electronic reporting data scoreboards.
FEASIBILITY: ROI reveals that the costs associated with professions
independently managing clinical student placements makes a strong
business case with single multi-profession placement office.
KW - Health Professions Education
KW - Educational Administration
KW - Medical Education
UR - https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/faculty/45
M3 - Poster
ER -