Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of urinary dysfunction following midurethral sling placement: A comparison of two voiding trial methods

  • Angela Leffelman
  • , Henry H Chill
  • , Ayesha Kar
  • , Sonia Gilani
  • , Cecilia Chang
  • , Roger P Goldberg
  • , Ghazaleh Rostaminia
  • , Advocate Ob/Gyn Residents - Illinois Masonic
  • Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS), Division of Urogynecology, University of Chicago, Northshore University HealthSystem, Skokie, IL, USA.
  • Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS), Division of Urogynecology, University of Chicago, Northshore University HealthSystem, Skokie, IL, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Advocate Health - Midwest
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute, Evanston, IL, USA.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
DOIs
StatusPublished - Jun 1 2024

Keywords

  • Stress urinary incontinence
  • mid urethral sling
  • passive voiding trial
  • urinary retention
  • active voiding trial
  • voiding trial

Cite this