TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter Study on the Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Over 40,000 Patients
T2 - MANIFEST-US
AU - MANIFEST-US Investigators
AU - Turagam, Mohit K.
AU - Aryana, Arash
AU - Day, John D.
AU - Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
AU - Hounshell, Troy
AU - Nair, Devi
AU - Natale, Andrea
AU - Weiner, Stanislav
AU - Cheung, Jim W.
AU - Chinitz, Larry
AU - Cuoco, Frank
AU - Daccarett, Marcos
AU - Dandamudi, Sanjay
AU - Gambhir, Alok
AU - Gandhavadi, Maheer
AU - Kim, Jamie
AU - Metzl, Mark D.
AU - Mikaelian, Bradley
AU - Peress, Darren
AU - Romero, Jorge E.
AU - Sanchez, Javier
AU - Sandler, David A.
AU - Shaik, Naushad A.
AU - Shehata, Michael
AU - Siddique, Sultan M.
AU - Singh, Abhinav
AU - Singleton, Matthew J.
AU - Sundaram, Sri
AU - Vivas, Yoel
AU - Waks, Jonathan W.
AU - Yamamura, Kenneth H.
AU - Zipse, Matthew
AU - Ahn, Joon
AU - Al Chekakie, Obadah
AU - Ali, Mahmoud
AU - Ascandar, Nameer
AU - Bansal, Sandeep
AU - Beaser, Andrew D.
AU - Bisla, Jaskanwal
AU - Brancato, Scott
AU - Callans, David J.
AU - Chang-Sing, Peter
AU - Chothia, Rashaad
AU - Dell'Orfano, Joseph
AU - DeLurgio, David B.
AU - Doshi, Shephal K.
AU - Erickson, Lynn
AU - Gautam, Sandeep
AU - Gottipaty, Venkateshwar
AU - Sra, Jasbir
N1 - Copyright © 2026 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/1/20
Y1 - 2026/1/20
N2 - Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is emerging as the preferred energy source for atrial fibrillation ablation, largely because of its promising safety profile, including lower risks of esophageal injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, and phrenic nerve injury. However, rare complications may only emerge after treating many thousands of patients. Objectives: This study sought to determine the real-world utilization and safety profile of the pentaspline PFA catheter in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, invitations were sent to U.S. centers performing PFA with the pentaspline catheter. Centers submitted data on patient demographics, procedural details, and adverse events (AEs). The main outcomes included the incidence of major and minor procedure-related AEs. Results: Of the 435 centers contacted, 102 participated, averaging 5.1 operators per center (range 1-16 operators per center). Each center treated a median of 412 patients (range 26-1,961 patients), totaling 41,968 patients between February 2024 and July 2025. The median patient age was 68 years (range 17-99 years), and 56% were male. Most patients underwent first-time ablation (73%), primarily for paroxysmal (54%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (37%). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 93% of patients, with extravenous lesions on the posterior wall (57%), cavotricuspid isthmus (31%), or mitral isthmus (14%). Major AEs occurred in only 0.63% of patients, including cardiac tamponade (0.16%), vascular injury requiring intervention (0.18%), and stroke (0.10%). Importantly, no cases of esophageal fistula, persistent phrenic nerve paralysis, or pulmonary vein stenosis occurred. Mortality at 30 days was rare (0.04%), but there was a potential signal for rare (0.019%) unexplained sudden death/cardiac arrest. Rare AEs included coronary spasm (0.10%) and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (0.02%). Minor complications were reported in 2.05%, mainly vascular issues (0.96%), pericarditis (0.52%), and self-limited esophageal dysmotility (0.04%). Conclusions: In a real-world setting of unselected U.S. patients, PFA demonstrated a safety profile consistent with preferentiality to functional myocardial tissue ablation, without evidence of esophageal fistula or pulmonary vein stenosis. The major complication rate was ∼0.6%—mostly vascular AEs and pericardial tamponade. Stroke (∼1 in 1,000) and death (∼1 in 2,000) were rare. These data indicate that the initial implementation of pentaspline PFA has been overall safe.
AB - Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is emerging as the preferred energy source for atrial fibrillation ablation, largely because of its promising safety profile, including lower risks of esophageal injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, and phrenic nerve injury. However, rare complications may only emerge after treating many thousands of patients. Objectives: This study sought to determine the real-world utilization and safety profile of the pentaspline PFA catheter in the United States. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, invitations were sent to U.S. centers performing PFA with the pentaspline catheter. Centers submitted data on patient demographics, procedural details, and adverse events (AEs). The main outcomes included the incidence of major and minor procedure-related AEs. Results: Of the 435 centers contacted, 102 participated, averaging 5.1 operators per center (range 1-16 operators per center). Each center treated a median of 412 patients (range 26-1,961 patients), totaling 41,968 patients between February 2024 and July 2025. The median patient age was 68 years (range 17-99 years), and 56% were male. Most patients underwent first-time ablation (73%), primarily for paroxysmal (54%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (37%). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 93% of patients, with extravenous lesions on the posterior wall (57%), cavotricuspid isthmus (31%), or mitral isthmus (14%). Major AEs occurred in only 0.63% of patients, including cardiac tamponade (0.16%), vascular injury requiring intervention (0.18%), and stroke (0.10%). Importantly, no cases of esophageal fistula, persistent phrenic nerve paralysis, or pulmonary vein stenosis occurred. Mortality at 30 days was rare (0.04%), but there was a potential signal for rare (0.019%) unexplained sudden death/cardiac arrest. Rare AEs included coronary spasm (0.10%) and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (0.02%). Minor complications were reported in 2.05%, mainly vascular issues (0.96%), pericarditis (0.52%), and self-limited esophageal dysmotility (0.04%). Conclusions: In a real-world setting of unselected U.S. patients, PFA demonstrated a safety profile consistent with preferentiality to functional myocardial tissue ablation, without evidence of esophageal fistula or pulmonary vein stenosis. The major complication rate was ∼0.6%—mostly vascular AEs and pericardial tamponade. Stroke (∼1 in 1,000) and death (∼1 in 2,000) were rare. These data indicate that the initial implementation of pentaspline PFA has been overall safe.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - pentaspline catheter
KW - pulsed field ablation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026551921
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026551921#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.10.051
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.10.051
M3 - Article
C2 - 41389071
AN - SCOPUS:105026551921
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 87
SP - 172
EP - 193
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -